







Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, GETTR, Truth Social, Twitter, Youtube, Instagram
Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont is calling for an immediate pause on the installation of new automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras and surveillance technology across his state — acknowledging what The Georgia Record has been reporting aggressively for months: municipalities are deploying mass surveillance infrastructure on American citizens without informed consent, without clear privacy protections, and without accountability.
In a letter delivered August 7, 2026 to the Connecticut Police Officers Standards and Training Council, Lamont requested that within 30 days the council develop binding guidance for local and state police departments on the use of surveillance cameras and ALPRs — including what data is collected, how long it is stored, who has access to it, and under what conditions it can be shared.
"I am in agreement with the many residents across Connecticut who are seeing this technology being implemented by their towns and are wondering what types of privacy protections are being implemented for ordinary people who are just going about their lives," Lamont said. "We must have clear policies in place regarding what is happening with this data, who has access to it, and how it can be used."
The governor is urging all municipalities to immediately pause installation of any new cameras and ALPRs until the guidance is finalized.
While Connecticut is just now waking up to the problem, The Georgia Record has spent months exposing the company at the center of this surveillance expansion: Atlanta-based Flock Safety — one of the largest automated license plate reader networks in American history, operating an estimated 100,000 cameras across thousands of communities nationwide, largely without the informed consent of the residents being surveilled.
Our reporting has documented a pattern of corporate arrogance, privacy violations, and government overreach:
Governor Lamont’s letter identifies the core failure that The Georgia Record has been spotlighting for months: Americans are being surveilled by private corporations and local governments with no clear legal framework, no public disclosure, and no meaningful consent. Residents simply drive past a camera — often installed with no public vote or community input — and their movements, vehicle data, and associations are logged, stored, and potentially shared with federal law enforcement.
Connecticut’s pause applies to school zone traffic cameras, work zone speed cameras, fixed ALPR devices, and drones. Lamont signed legislation in May (Public Act 26-14) attempting to address some privacy concerns, but acknowledged more is needed.
Georgia has no such pause. No such review. And Flock Safety — an Atlanta company — continues to expand its network across the state and the country, largely unchecked.
If one blue-state governor can recognize the threat to civil liberties posed by mass surveillance infrastructure deployed without informed consent, Georgia’s legislators have no excuse for their silence.
Source: Office of Governor Ned Lamont







Looking at Deflock Org this morning, shows us that there are 127,666 Tag Cams in use in the USA.
But it also shows 100 cities are now rejecting them.
As I have said before, if there is nothing fear from these cams then let the pubic track our elected reps.
The larger question is::
What would happen if a shadow organization installed cameras that recorded all of the FLOCK employees at their homes and worksites? Or on the dwellings of all of the "lawmakers" that made the decision to have them installed for the public?